OUR FANHOUSE TOOLBAR INTEGRATES THE LATEST SPORTS NEWS INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER AND INSTALLS IN SECONDS.
YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TOOLBAR HERE.

Golf

Like It or Not, Tiger Woods Is the PGA


On Sunday, Tiger Woods won for the 66th time on the PGA Tour. He's been the World No. 1 for 542 of the previous 594 weeks, dating back to June 15, 1997, when he first knocked Greg Norman from atop the rankings.

In the nearly 12 years since, Tiger has 14 major victories -- just four shy of Jack Nicklaus' record. He's made nearly a billion dollars in earnings and endorsements, and is arguably the most recognizable athlete on the planet.

Consequently, Woods is always news, even if he's playing poorly -- or worse, not playing at all. And it's for these reasons that some fans (and, ironically, the media) cringe every time Tiger's face is beamed into their living rooms.

I fully understand what it means to be beaten about the head with banal story lines, but golf is a sport in need of a face. Unlike the NFL or Major League Baseball, where the fan bases are regional and loyalties are passed down from generation to generation, golfers compete individually, and their professional existence is, by nature, a transient one.

Those facts coupled with a slumping economy and the lack of any other compelling narratives makes Woods the de facto face of the sport.

Yes, Phil Mickelson, the second-ranked player in the world, has narrowed the gap in the points standings, but that's only because Tiger took eight months off to recover from reconstructive knee surgery. Lefty's career can be summed up in one sentence: Fantastic player, wrong era.

Instead of being mentioned as one of the best golfers in the history of the game, his career will always come with the "could never escape Tiger's shadow" qualification. Fair or not, that's the reality. It's also why the tour needs Woods; because there's nothing that affects people's viewing habits quite like a Tiger Sunday charge.
The Sports Business Daily reported that "NBC Sunday earned a 4.9/10 overnight Nielsen rating from 2:30-8:00pm ET for its telecast of the final round of the Arnold Palmer Invitational, which saw Tiger Woods come from behind to win his first tournament since last year's U.S. Open. The 4.9 rating is up 22.5% from a 4.0/9 for the final round last year, which aired until 6:00pm ET, and also marks the best overnight rating for a golf telecast since the final round of the U.S. Open last year.
To be clear: Woods also won the 2008 Arnold Palmer Invitational in theatrical fashion, draining a 21-foot birdie putt on the 72nd hole. The fact that ratings were up more than 22 percent lends credence to the argument that a tour without Tiger is no tour at all. At least as far as viewers are concerned.

Then there's this:
"Excluding The Masters and the U.S. Open, the 4.9 rating is also the best overnight for any golf telecast in two years. The rating peaked at a 7.8/13 from 7:30-8:00pm, which included Woods' winning putt on the 18th hole. Saturday's third round coverage on NBC delivered a 2.7/6, up 17.4% from a 2.3/6 last year."

The previous best tour round of the last two years? The 2007 Buick Invitational, won by Woods.
Also worth mentioning: Woods went up against the Elite Eight Oklahoma-UNC game and won that too. (Although, because of a 90-minute rain delay to start the day, Tiger didn't finish his round until almost 8 PM EST, more than 30 minutes after the Tar Heels breezed to victory over the Sooners).

There's no disputing that Tiger, the tour, and television are inextricably linked. And there will always be a subset of viewers who are bothered by the nonstop coverage. But the alternative -- lukewarm interest on a broad scale and the dreaded "niche sport" label -- isn't good for anyone, either. Just ask the LPGA.

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)