
They're called "major championships" because of their history. Unlike the Buick Open or the St. Jude Classic, these tournaments are about more than just one victory. They're about adding yourself to the history books.
The Masters has Augusta National and the famed green jacket. It's the tournament that defines the golf world, right down to Amen Corner, the Eisenhower Pine and "the shot heard 'round the world." Winning the Masters gains you admittance into one of the most exclusive dinners in all of sports, where only past champions can meet during Masters week. The U.S. Open is America's championship, known to be the toughest test in golf. The British Open is the world's tournament, known to most outside the U.S. as, simply, The Open Championship. Winning it lands you the Claret Jug and the title of "champion golfer of the year."
But what does the PGA Championship bring? For every major victory Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson have had this decade, we've also been handed the Shaun Micheels and Rich Beems of the world (not to knock them, it just doesn't feel like major winners). The PGA Championship had the right idea when it first became a championship. It was distinctive because it was the only major that was played in the match play format. Up until 1957, it was a match play event, and it needs to return to that format. The problem is, it'll never happen.
With all the big events popping up on the PGA Tour these days (the WGCs, Players and Tour Championship, not to mention the FedEx Cup), the PGA Championship seems to be a little too "normal." It has an elite field on a tough golf course, but you almost get the feel that it's the ugly sister to the U.S. Open ... from the same womb, just not nearly as attractive.
Changing to match play would give it a unique feel. You play 36 holes of stroke play to qualify for the match play (low 64 move on) and get ranked by what you shot, similar to the U.S. Amateur. From there, it is win or go home, and you'd get to see players battle it out for a much bigger prize than the Accenture Match Play. This format works wonders at the Ryder Cup, and should be implemented more than once a year on the PGA Tour. It's a game regular golfers prefer over stroke play anyway, and a format that is huge in every level of golf besides professional.
The problem this will never happen is the same as with a lot of corporate situations ... the business side wouldn't agree with the logic. The networks use the majors as rating boosters, and if, lord forbid, Tiger Woods got knocked out in the first couple of rounds, and the final match was Lee Westwood versus K.J. Choi, exactly 43 people would tune in to see who won. (On the flip side of this lies the possibility that Tiger would face Phil or Sergio Garcia in the finals, and the last time Tiger was in a major championship playoff, the ratings tended to jump.)
It is something I have found to be almost too logical, yet nobody wants to agree that the PGA Championship, above all other tournaments, needs a little flavor. A match play championship at the end of the year to decide one of the four major winners? If that was upcoming, I'd be downright giddy.














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-10-2009 @ 5:08PM
lpuchala said...
There are only about 6 or 7 golfers in all of the world that I would like to see in a final round shoot-out in a match play PGA. At least 2 of the major winners from this year (Lucas "1 prior win, instant glory" Tanner and Stewart Cink almost ranks with "clank" with his awe-inspiring 5 career wins prior to Turnberry) are not there. Angel Cabrera (probably mis-spelled) is not much better but at least he had one major going in to the Masters. For a tremendous number of final pairings (most of them) the TV ratings would lose to a WNBA doubleheader by at least a 20 to 1 margin.
Reply
8-10-2009 @ 8:55PM
bouckes said...
Shane-
I always read your comments with great interest.
I have a suggestion for the PGA Championship format. Thurs-Fri: each player chooses his best score for each hole hole-by-hole over the two days. Sat-Sun: the usual 'stroke play' format. Or, reverse the two day format. Essentially, it's a 54-hole score, but would make this a unique format.
I think it would bring more players into the 'mix', and that's always a good thing.
Reply
8-10-2009 @ 11:09PM
danbo800 said...
I would not like that format. It is always fun to have the possibility of so many players having a chance come Sunday and if one player has one bad day they are gone. It is also exciting when Tiger makes a move on Sunday and you have so many players in the mix it just makes for exciting golf. I think the PGA Championship is just fine how it is. Look at some of the amazing finishes there have been in the PGA Championship. Bob May and Tiger. Rich Beem and Tiger going at it. Tiger and Sergio in 99. I think it makes for great entertainment since its the last major of the year and the last shot till April. I cant wait 3 more days.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 11:07AM
furrsher said...
Change, did you say change? The Eastern Elitists that govern USGA think it's radical when they move a major tournament out of the East Coast. They can't be to far from their private country clubs. Their officials are made up of pipe smoking, bow tied Ivy Leaguers who look down their noses at the Midwest and detest the West.
Reply