The PGA Championship begins Thursday, and as has been the case in the three previous majors this year, Tiger Woods is the clear favorite. Despite victories in consecutive weeks leading up to this event, the story is as much about the level of his play as it is about how he won at Firestone Sunday. The circumstances have been well documented, but for the unenlightened, the Cliffs Notes version: Padraig Harrington led the WGC-Bridgestone Invitational by one stroke over Tiger as they made their way to the 16th tee. At some point on the hole the group was put on the clock for slow play, Paddy went on to record an eight on the par 5, Woods carded a birdie, and two holes later he was hoisting the trophy.
After the round, however, Woods told the media that he thought rules official John Paramor had unnecessarily intervened, and by doing so caused Harrington to rush a chip shot that eventually settled at the bottom of the pond fronting the green. Tiger will be fined for his insolence, even though he was exactly right to question what Paramor was doing.
Don't misunderstand: I abhor slow play. Most people do. But how about some discretion when applying the rules? I know, I know, golf is different, the players police themselves, rules are rules, so on and so forth.
Maybe part of the problem -- at least for those people who didn't take issue with Paramor's decision -- is that Paddy is glacially slow. As Golf Digest's John Strege points out, his magazine had a story about Harrington's comprehensive approach to hitting a single shot way back in 2003:
"The most persistent criticism of Harrington has related to his pace of play. Depending on your point of view, he is either slow, very slow or a man who takes an hour and a half to watch '60 Minutes.'And again in 2005:
"'He's very underrated, and he can win anywhere, but he is a little slow,' says Paul Azinger. 'I think that hurts him in the majors, where officials tend to get on you about it.'"
"At every level of the game, slow play is a scourge. It's a pox. It's an ugly, oozing sore. Everyone who plays golf has slammed up against it. A good many have been driven away by it.And then there's my all-time favorite moment from the Slow Play Chronicles: Rory Sabbatini, one of the tour's fastest players, was paired with Ben Crane, one of its slowest, at the 2005 Booz Allen Classic. Unintentional comedy ensued.
"Bernhard Langer, Padraig Harrington and the ironically named Niclas Fasth prove slow play isn't an All-American malady..."
Sabbatini was seen admonishing Crane for his slow play as they were walking off the course at Congressional Country Club, and the winner of this event in 2003 also showed his displeasure by playing ahead on hole No. 17, walking toward the 18th tee and leaving his partner in the fairway.It's worth noting that even though Tiger defended Harrington following Bridgestone, he would love to see rounds finish in something less than five or six hours. The issue: enforcement.
That incident came soon after the duo had been warned and timed over the previous holes for slow play. By the time Sabbatini and Crane reached No. 17, they were no longer being timed.
When the penalty for slow play hasn't been enforced in 17 years, it's not much of a deterrent, and that's the dilemma. Until that changes, players will continue to be warned. In the meantime, it will be a matter of who can put the mid-round intrusion out of their mind and who can't.














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-11-2009 @ 1:24PM
marktmurphy5 said...
It may be just me, but Tiger has always struck me as one of the slowest players. I never played much so I confess I don't know the rule. I was always a grip it and rip it player. What's the official definition of "slow play"?
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 5:23PM
James said...
The officals 'clock' the players. I'm not sure what the 'time' they use to indicate slow play.
Jack Nicholas was a very deliberate player, as is Tiger, Harrington, and a number of others.
I agree with Tiger that it was a poor time to warn the players on 'slow play.' They were the last group on the course. It made Harrington rush his shots, hence his fallout the 16th.
This had the makings for a fantastic finish. I hope the officals will use some common sense in the future. Kudos for Tiger speaking out and defending Harrington.
8-11-2009 @ 1:45PM
Ann said...
What's wrong of being slow? I think the player can have as much time as he or she wants to. Everybody sees how much difference can the timing make to Padraig. He eventually lost when he was very close to win. I'm not opposing Tiger or anything. I was just thinking that I wouldn't be happy either if I win because of this kind of coincidence! It's not a true win after all!
http://www.newsy.com/videos/has_tiger_earned_his_stripes
Critics say that Tiger may not be good enough to be called the best golfer! They compare him with other greatest golfer of the time. We'll see if he's really worth to be calling the best golfer when he meets Padraig again on the green!
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 1:47PM
bpar5 said...
Slow play had nothing to do with Woods or Harrington. It was all about t.v. time slots.
I have seen them go past the t.v. alloted time
just to show Tiger finish up a round. Woods and
Harrington were the last group what's the big deal?
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 3:24PM
guspros said...
Nothing worse than waiting on every shot for 4 or 5 minutes. How anyone can concentrate and keep their head in the game is beyond me.
Either hit the ball or let the group behind you play through. Any round of golf over 4 hours is brutal, if you're just the average player on a public course.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 3:26PM
Ed Fielding said...
It's not just the pros. Slow play is just so damned aggravating. I may just be a mid 90's duffer, but at least I'm a fast mid 90's duffer.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 3:30PM
Ed Fielding said...
Normally I play at about a 3 1/2 hour pace, but played a couple of weeks ago with guys that took over 6 hours. It was excruciating and it made me play even worse than normal. And that's saying something.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 4:16PM
Martin said...
If there are rules to prevent slow play, those rules need to be strictly enforced as to everyone, even the last pair of the day, as the last pair should not get an advantage over the other competitors. The problem is that when rules are enforced some of the time but ignored at other times, an inference arises (rightly or wrongly) that the enforcement was for an ulterior purpose (like trying to give an advantage to another player). Enforce the rules at all time, and everyone will then be treated equally and no one can complain.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 4:40PM
obamaizamarxist said...
Harrington, and Bernard Langer are still finishing a round they started in 2006..
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 5:26PM
johnjennings said...
Possible rule change- reward the final group on Sunday with an expanded clock. This was an exceptional final pairing that should not of had this issue come up.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 5:28PM
James said...
lol....I know what you mean. We played yesterday and it must of taken us 5 hours to play 18 holes.
We got behind a foursome of women. They were behind a foursome of women. lol. We are long ball hitters and play quickly. The woman have just as much right to play as we do...but it makes you want to pull your hair out of your head when their shots only go 40 yards : ) AHHHHHHHHHHHH !!!
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 5:43PM
ckelsonsr said...
golf is always talking about its image, well it did itself a disservice sunday by interupting a great final pairing by putting them on the clock, what a joke, the best finish of the year, what was the rush they were the last pairing, didnt have to worry about daylight. and what if they finished tied,they would have played on so it didnt make sense to rush them in the last 2 holes. and tiger did the right thing by speaking out, if they want people to watch cut back on the commercials, and the round will finish ontime
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 6:12PM
cjgdnight said...
ckels.... cut back on commercials and it will end on time????
Do you think the whole golf course stops when CBS cuts to commercial? LOL
8-11-2009 @ 9:33PM
jmaltus said...
A twosome playing any round in four hours is crazy. They should both have been DQ'ed for being so disrespectful of the game. A pox on both of them.
Reply
8-12-2009 @ 4:26PM
amorash said...
I played in St Andrews once..on first Tee there is a sign warning sign about how "fast" a round should be played..think it said " The proper game of Golf is to played within 4hr , no more. Beware.
Reply
8-13-2009 @ 8:35AM
mitzy545 said...
as a golfer my self im sorry that you have to play with someone that play and talk so bad on t.v and they dont do anythink about that i no you play slow so dose tiger but i have never heard you cuss so good luck i think if you cuss on t.v you should be kick off until you stop.thanks carl?
Reply